https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339993 The High Court found that the respondents had recovered customs duty from the defaulters. The Court noted the dispute over interest payment, emphasizing that the issue could not be resolved within its jurisdiction. The attachment on the petitioner's property was ordered to continue for four weeks, allowing the respondents to pursue legal proceedings for relief. If no action was taken, the property would be released. The Court clarified it had not assessed the claim for interest or the attachment's legality. The judgment was detailed, covering various aspects of the case without issuing costs. en-us Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Mar 2017 09:02:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339993 The High Court found that the respondents had recovered customs duty from the defaulters. The Court noted the dispute over interest payment, emphasizing that the issue could not be resolved within its jurisdiction. The attachment on the petitioner's property was ordered to continue for four weeks, allowing the respondents to pursue legal proceedings for relief. If no action was taken, the property would be released. The Court clarified it had not assessed the claim for interest or the attachment's legality. The judgment was detailed, covering various aspects of the case without issuing costs. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339993