https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339986 The Tribunal upheld the Designated Authority's decision to impose Anti-Dumping duty on vitrified/Porcelain tiles imported from China PR, denying individual dumping margins to the appellants. The Tribunal allowed condonation of delay in filing appeals, finding the appeals legally sustainable despite the DA's alleged failure to appreciate submissions. The request for New Shipper Review and individual dumping margin was rejected due to discrepancies in declarations and lack of transparency in commercial transactions. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals and related applications, upholding the levy of Anti-Dumping duty based on the DA's findings. en-us Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Feb 2018 11:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339986 The Tribunal upheld the Designated Authority's decision to impose Anti-Dumping duty on vitrified/Porcelain tiles imported from China PR, denying individual dumping margins to the appellants. The Tribunal allowed condonation of delay in filing appeals, finding the appeals legally sustainable despite the DA's alleged failure to appreciate submissions. The request for New Shipper Review and individual dumping margin was rejected due to discrepancies in declarations and lack of transparency in commercial transactions. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals and related applications, upholding the levy of Anti-Dumping duty based on the DA's findings. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339986