<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 484 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339981</link>
    <description>The Court found the petitioner not entitled to supply liquor due to unpaid dues, allowing adjustment for waived fees and directing clearance of outstanding dues for supply restoration. The Court emphasized the recovery right of respondents for unpaid dues, with waived fees deducted from the outstanding amount. It highlighted the non-maintainability of a writ petition solely against show cause notices, granting time for dues clearance and reserving the right for respondents to take action if dues remained unpaid, in accordance with statutory provisions. The Court disposed of both writ petitions, emphasizing the premature nature of the petition against show cause notices alone and the discretionary nature of writ jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 08:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 484 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339981</link>
      <description>The Court found the petitioner not entitled to supply liquor due to unpaid dues, allowing adjustment for waived fees and directing clearance of outstanding dues for supply restoration. The Court emphasized the recovery right of respondents for unpaid dues, with waived fees deducted from the outstanding amount. It highlighted the non-maintainability of a writ petition solely against show cause notices, granting time for dues clearance and reserving the right for respondents to take action if dues remained unpaid, in accordance with statutory provisions. The Court disposed of both writ petitions, emphasizing the premature nature of the petition against show cause notices alone and the discretionary nature of writ jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>