<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1224 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190953</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondent to release the goods upon payment of the tax component of 29,324 by the petitioner, who was also required to provide a bank guarantee for the remaining amount. Other claims by the respondent were to be addressed separately, with no costs imposed on the petitioner. The court&#039;s decision resulted in the closure of the connected Miscellaneous Petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2017 06:52:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1224 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190953</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondent to release the goods upon payment of the tax component of 29,324 by the petitioner, who was also required to provide a bank guarantee for the remaining amount. Other claims by the respondent were to be addressed separately, with no costs imposed on the petitioner. The court&#039;s decision resulted in the closure of the connected Miscellaneous Petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>