<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1647 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190954</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed. CENVAT credit was granted for the catering service without interest or penalty. However, no credit was given for the service tax on renting the cycle stand, with no penalty imposed. The appellant was directed to adjust the CENVAT credit based on recovered employee contributions towards catering costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2017 06:52:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1647 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190954</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed. CENVAT credit was granted for the catering service without interest or penalty. However, no credit was given for the service tax on renting the cycle stand, with no penalty imposed. The appellant was directed to adjust the CENVAT credit based on recovered employee contributions towards catering costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>