<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1381 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190955</link>
    <description>The revision was allowed, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order. The court upheld the validity of goods seizure and cash security demand under Section 48 of the U.P. VAT Act due to fraudulent transportation of goods within U.P. with forged documents to evade tax. The claim of Delhi-U.P. Border area as &quot;no-man&#039;s land&quot; was rejected, affirming its inclusion in U.P. territory. Transporters were deemed complicit in fictitious transactions to evade tax. The court emphasized Section 48 over Section 52 for fraudulent transportation, asserting legislative intent against protecting fraudulent acts. Penalty proceedings were to proceed independently of the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1381 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190955</link>
      <description>The revision was allowed, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order. The court upheld the validity of goods seizure and cash security demand under Section 48 of the U.P. VAT Act due to fraudulent transportation of goods within U.P. with forged documents to evade tax. The claim of Delhi-U.P. Border area as &quot;no-man&#039;s land&quot; was rejected, affirming its inclusion in U.P. territory. Transporters were deemed complicit in fictitious transactions to evade tax. The court emphasized Section 48 over Section 52 for fraudulent transportation, asserting legislative intent against protecting fraudulent acts. Penalty proceedings were to proceed independently of the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>