https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190952 The Supreme Court held that Rule 71 of the Hyderabad Land Revenue Rules and Rule 81 of the Bombay Land Revenue Rules did not violate Article 14 as they provided adequate guidelines for Non-Agricultural (N.A.) assessment. The Court found that the rules had safeguards against arbitrary exercise of power and dismissed the writ petitions challenging the rules' constitutionality. The High Court's judgments were quashed, and the appeals were allowed in favor of upholding the validity of the rules. en-us Fri, 06 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:13:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190952 The Supreme Court held that Rule 71 of the Hyderabad Land Revenue Rules and Rule 81 of the Bombay Land Revenue Rules did not violate Article 14 as they provided adequate guidelines for Non-Agricultural (N.A.) assessment. The Court found that the rules had safeguards against arbitrary exercise of power and dismissed the writ petitions challenging the rules' constitutionality. The High Court's judgments were quashed, and the appeals were allowed in favor of upholding the validity of the rules. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190952