<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 702 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190950</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction remained available where the challenge to rectification orders and demand notices was consequential to a challenge against the underlying circular; the existence of an appellate remedy did not bar relief, and the alternative-remedy objection was rejected. The High Court also followed its earlier binding ruling that the relevant Sixth Schedule entry had not been revived, so tax could not be levied on processing and supply of photographs, photo prints and negatives. On that basis, the re-rectification orders and consequential demand notices were quashed, and the assessees obtained complete relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:54:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 702 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190950</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction remained available where the challenge to rectification orders and demand notices was consequential to a challenge against the underlying circular; the existence of an appellate remedy did not bar relief, and the alternative-remedy objection was rejected. The High Court also followed its earlier binding ruling that the relevant Sixth Schedule entry had not been revived, so tax could not be levied on processing and supply of photographs, photo prints and negatives. On that basis, the re-rectification orders and consequential demand notices were quashed, and the assessees obtained complete relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>