<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (12) TMI 339 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190948</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s position in a case concerning the assessment year 1974-75. Discrepancies in income figures were noted, with the Tribunal favoring figures from the assessee&#039;s books over other sources. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper explanations regarding entries and the importance of treating credit entries as loans if indicated. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was supported by the High Court, highlighting the ITO&#039;s best judgment powers in cases of unreliable material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:44:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (12) TMI 339 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190948</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s position in a case concerning the assessment year 1974-75. Discrepancies in income figures were noted, with the Tribunal favoring figures from the assessee&#039;s books over other sources. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper explanations regarding entries and the importance of treating credit entries as loans if indicated. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was supported by the High Court, highlighting the ITO&#039;s best judgment powers in cases of unreliable material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>