https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190945 Statutory vesting of a public tank and adjoining lands was construed as vesting for control, supervision and beneficial administration, not as absolute ownership in the Gram Panchayat. The land was treated as dedicated to preservation of the tank, with the Government retaining overriding regulatory power. The ryotwari patta entered in individual names was held to be incidental to the institution and not an independent personal title. Because the inams statute operated as a complete code with special remedies and an express bar on civil jurisdiction except on limited grounds such as fraud or misrepresentation, suits seeking to reopen the statutory title determination were not maintainable. en-us Fri, 26 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:50:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190945 Statutory vesting of a public tank and adjoining lands was construed as vesting for control, supervision and beneficial administration, not as absolute ownership in the Gram Panchayat. The land was treated as dedicated to preservation of the tank, with the Government retaining overriding regulatory power. The ryotwari patta entered in individual names was held to be incidental to the institution and not an independent personal title. Because the inams statute operated as a complete code with special remedies and an express bar on civil jurisdiction except on limited grounds such as fraud or misrepresentation, suits seeking to reopen the statutory title determination were not maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190945