https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190945 The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of both suits, concluding that the tank and appurtenant land vested in the Gram Panchayat for control and supervision. The descendants did not acquire personal ownership rights through adverse possession or the grant of Ryotwari patta. The Court held that the Civil Court's jurisdiction was excluded by the Inams Act, rendering the descendants' suit not maintainable. Each party was directed to bear their own costs. en-us Fri, 26 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:50:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190945 The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of both suits, concluding that the tank and appurtenant land vested in the Gram Panchayat for control and supervision. The descendants did not acquire personal ownership rights through adverse possession or the grant of Ryotwari patta. The Court held that the Civil Court's jurisdiction was excluded by the Inams Act, rendering the descendants' suit not maintainable. Each party was directed to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190945