https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190944 The court held that writ petitions should not be directly entertained for violations of Chapter V-A of the Industrial Disputes Act or principles of natural justice without exhausting statutory remedies. It emphasized pursuing remedies under the Industrial Disputes Act first and exercising writ jurisdiction sparingly. The court overruled previous decisions allowing direct writ petitions and stressed the need for caution in invoking Article 226. en-us Wed, 01 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:39:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190944 The court held that writ petitions should not be directly entertained for violations of Chapter V-A of the Industrial Disputes Act or principles of natural justice without exhausting statutory remedies. It emphasized pursuing remedies under the Industrial Disputes Act first and exercising writ jurisdiction sparingly. The court overruled previous decisions allowing direct writ petitions and stressed the need for caution in invoking Article 226. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190944