<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 1006 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190937</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI upheld the imposition of a penalty of Rs. 11,57,062 on the appellants who admitted liability before the Settlement Commission for supplying invoices without goods, resulting in a fraudulent claim for Cenvat credit. The Tribunal dismissed the stay application, requiring the appellants to make a pre-deposit of the entire demand within four weeks to comply with the Settlement Commission&#039;s order and protect the Revenue&#039;s interest. The decision was based on the lack of machinery for actual production, indicating a prima facie case against the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 1006 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190937</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI upheld the imposition of a penalty of Rs. 11,57,062 on the appellants who admitted liability before the Settlement Commission for supplying invoices without goods, resulting in a fraudulent claim for Cenvat credit. The Tribunal dismissed the stay application, requiring the appellants to make a pre-deposit of the entire demand within four weeks to comply with the Settlement Commission&#039;s order and protect the Revenue&#039;s interest. The decision was based on the lack of machinery for actual production, indicating a prima facie case against the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>