<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 459 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339956</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit was held admissible where duty-paid inputs moved directly from the manufacturer to the assessee under the manufacturer&#039;s invoice in a transit sale arrangement. The circular applied to such transactions clarified that no separate invoice under Rule 57G was required and that intermediaries taking part in the transit sale need not be registered. Because the inputs and supporting duty-paid documents were received and used in manufacture, the presence of unregistered intermediaries and minor procedural lapses did not justify denial of credit when the substantive conditions were satisfied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 459 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339956</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit was held admissible where duty-paid inputs moved directly from the manufacturer to the assessee under the manufacturer&#039;s invoice in a transit sale arrangement. The circular applied to such transactions clarified that no separate invoice under Rule 57G was required and that intermediaries taking part in the transit sale need not be registered. Because the inputs and supporting duty-paid documents were received and used in manufacture, the presence of unregistered intermediaries and minor procedural lapses did not justify denial of credit when the substantive conditions were satisfied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>