<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 458 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339955</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that adjusting a sanctioned refund against a confirmed demand, while an appeal was pending, was premature. Despite the duty and penalty amounts being recovered, the Adjudicating Authority ordered the refund adjustment against interest liability. The Tribunal found this premature and directed the release of the refund to the appellant within 30 days, emphasizing procedural fairness and proper consideration of circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 458 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339955</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that adjusting a sanctioned refund against a confirmed demand, while an appeal was pending, was premature. Despite the duty and penalty amounts being recovered, the Adjudicating Authority ordered the refund adjustment against interest liability. The Tribunal found this premature and directed the release of the refund to the appellant within 30 days, emphasizing procedural fairness and proper consideration of circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>