<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 454 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339951</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the demand for excise duty, confiscation of goods, and penalties imposed on employees of the manufacturing company for clandestine removal of excisable goods sent for job work without proper documentation. The appeal against the Order-in-Original was dismissed, affirming the lower authorities&#039; decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 454 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339951</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the demand for excise duty, confiscation of goods, and penalties imposed on employees of the manufacturing company for clandestine removal of excisable goods sent for job work without proper documentation. The appeal against the Order-in-Original was dismissed, affirming the lower authorities&#039; decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>