https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339946 The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant. It held that the demand for anti-dumping duty by the authorized officer during the gap period between provisional and final notifications was legally unsustainable. The tribunal also noted procedural lapses and jurisdictional issues, emphasizing the importance of compliance with legal provisions and procedural requirements in duty imposition and recovery. en-us Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Mar 2017 10:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339946 The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant. It held that the demand for anti-dumping duty by the authorized officer during the gap period between provisional and final notifications was legally unsustainable. The tribunal also noted procedural lapses and jurisdictional issues, emphasizing the importance of compliance with legal provisions and procedural requirements in duty imposition and recovery. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339946