<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (9) TMI 19 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7023</link>
    <description>Commission paid to an agent in Japan for securing coal supply contracts was held to be revenue expenditure allowable as a deduction under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The payment was made in the ordinary course of the assessee&#039;s coal business to obtain sales orders, and the rate of commission was found to accord with normal commercial practice. No monopoly right, exclusive privilege, or enduring advantage was acquired; the fact that the assessee entered a new market and paid a high commission did not alter the trading character of the outlay. The expenditure formed part of the profit-earning process and was allowed as a deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (9) TMI 19 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7023</link>
      <description>Commission paid to an agent in Japan for securing coal supply contracts was held to be revenue expenditure allowable as a deduction under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The payment was made in the ordinary course of the assessee&#039;s coal business to obtain sales orders, and the rate of commission was found to accord with normal commercial practice. No monopoly right, exclusive privilege, or enduring advantage was acquired; the fact that the assessee entered a new market and paid a high commission did not alter the trading character of the outlay. The expenditure formed part of the profit-earning process and was allowed as a deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>