<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 441 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339938</link>
    <description>The court instructed respondent no.1 to promptly resolve the pending revision petition within six weeks, allowing the petitioner or their representative to present their case. If the petitioner succeeds, the bank guarantee will be canceled and returned. The writ petition was disposed of with no cost implications, emphasizing timely resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 06:21:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 441 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339938</link>
      <description>The court instructed respondent no.1 to promptly resolve the pending revision petition within six weeks, allowing the petitioner or their representative to present their case. If the petitioner succeeds, the bank guarantee will be canceled and returned. The writ petition was disposed of with no cost implications, emphasizing timely resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>