<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Income Tax Case: Section 263 Revision Not Justified Due to Mistaken Disallowance u/s 14A by Assessee.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33686</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - addition u/s 14A - the assessee had erred on the revenue side and offered more amount of disallowance u/s 14A of the Act which has been accepted by the ld AO - it had only caused prejudice to the interest of the assessee. Hence, the dual conditions stipulated in section 263 of the Act are not satisfied cumulatively. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 06:20:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 06:20:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Income Tax Case: Section 263 Revision Not Justified Due to Mistaken Disallowance u/s 14A by Assessee.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33686</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - addition u/s 14A - the assessee had erred on the revenue side and offered more amount of disallowance u/s 14A of the Act which has been accepted by the ld AO - it had only caused prejudice to the interest of the assessee. Hence, the dual conditions stipulated in section 263 of the Act are not satisfied cumulatively. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 06:20:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=33686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>