https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339935 A part-time Masalchi engaged for limited hours was held not entitled to regularisation or retrospective monetary benefits from the date of completing ten years of service. The Supreme Court noted that G.O. Ms. No. 22 dated 28.02.2006 applied only to full-time daily wage employees who had completed ten years of continuous service as on 01.01.2006 and were otherwise eligible for regular appointment. G.O. Ms. No. 74 dated 27.06.2013 clarified that part-time and casual employees were outside that benefit. As the employee did not hold a sanctioned post, parity with full-time daily wage employees was unavailable, and the later regularisation order for part-time Masalchis was effective only prospectively. en-us Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Mar 2017 06:20:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339935 A part-time Masalchi engaged for limited hours was held not entitled to regularisation or retrospective monetary benefits from the date of completing ten years of service. The Supreme Court noted that G.O. Ms. No. 22 dated 28.02.2006 applied only to full-time daily wage employees who had completed ten years of continuous service as on 01.01.2006 and were otherwise eligible for regular appointment. G.O. Ms. No. 74 dated 27.06.2013 clarified that part-time and casual employees were outside that benefit. As the employee did not hold a sanctioned post, parity with full-time daily wage employees was unavailable, and the later regularisation order for part-time Masalchis was effective only prospectively. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339935