https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339928 The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to partially allow the appeal regarding unexplained bank deposits, dismissing the appellant's case due to non-appearance. The appellant's claims of working as a financial agent offering commission were rejected for lack of evidence, with only cash deposits considered for taxation. The ITAT emphasized the necessity of proper documentation to support claims in tax matters, affirming the CIT(A)'s findings based on the evidence presented. en-us Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Mar 2017 06:19:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339928 The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to partially allow the appeal regarding unexplained bank deposits, dismissing the appellant's case due to non-appearance. The appellant's claims of working as a financial agent offering commission were rejected for lack of evidence, with only cash deposits considered for taxation. The ITAT emphasized the necessity of proper documentation to support claims in tax matters, affirming the CIT(A)'s findings based on the evidence presented. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339928