<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1262 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190933</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal and deleting the disallowed amounts related to both sundry and transport creditors for the A.Y. 2010-11. The Tribunal found that the assessee had complied with tax obligations, provided relevant details, and that there was no justification for the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 21:53:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1262 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190933</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal and deleting the disallowed amounts related to both sundry and transport creditors for the A.Y. 2010-11. The Tribunal found that the assessee had complied with tax obligations, provided relevant details, and that there was no justification for the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>