<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (2) TMI 121 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190930</link>
    <description>The High Court disallowed the deduction of a partner&#039;s salary under section 10(4)(b) of the Income-tax Act, stating that such payments are prohibited regardless of the profit&#039;s destination. The Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider giving a direction under section 33(5) to exclude the salary from the family&#039;s income share, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive assessment of tax liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 17:46:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (2) TMI 121 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190930</link>
      <description>The High Court disallowed the deduction of a partner&#039;s salary under section 10(4)(b) of the Income-tax Act, stating that such payments are prohibited regardless of the profit&#039;s destination. The Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider giving a direction under section 33(5) to exclude the salary from the family&#039;s income share, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive assessment of tax liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>