https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190925 The Supreme Court set aside the Division Bench's order, allowing the appeal and emphasizing the significance of timely filing writ petitions. It clarified that judgments based on concessions are not binding precedents. The Court expressed concern over the financial burden on the State and highlighted the need for judicial restraint in imposing such burdens. The panel from 1980 was deemed inappropriate, disregarding other candidates' aspirations. The Court concluded that the reliance on previous judgments was misplaced, leading to the appeal's success without any cost orders. en-us Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Mar 2017 16:54:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190925 The Supreme Court set aside the Division Bench's order, allowing the appeal and emphasizing the significance of timely filing writ petitions. It clarified that judgments based on concessions are not binding precedents. The Court expressed concern over the financial burden on the State and highlighted the need for judicial restraint in imposing such burdens. The panel from 1980 was deemed inappropriate, disregarding other candidates' aspirations. The Court concluded that the reliance on previous judgments was misplaced, leading to the appeal's success without any cost orders. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190925