<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (7) TMI 18 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7016</link>
    <description>Strict construction of Wealth-tax Act exemptions governed the treatment of agricultural buildings, implements, debts and appellate enhancement. Staff quarters occupied by employees and labourers were not the company&#039;s own dwelling-house for section 2(e)(ii), so the exemption was denied. Electrical machinery used to supply energy for both agricultural and non-agricultural operations was not treated as exempt tools or implements under section 5(1)(ix), and no apportionment was accepted. An unassessed taxation liability existing on the valuation date was deductible as a debt owed under section 2(m), while the Tribunal could not entertain a revenue enhancement request beyond the subject-matter of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (7) TMI 18 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7016</link>
      <description>Strict construction of Wealth-tax Act exemptions governed the treatment of agricultural buildings, implements, debts and appellate enhancement. Staff quarters occupied by employees and labourers were not the company&#039;s own dwelling-house for section 2(e)(ii), so the exemption was denied. Electrical machinery used to supply energy for both agricultural and non-agricultural operations was not treated as exempt tools or implements under section 5(1)(ix), and no apportionment was accepted. An unassessed taxation liability existing on the valuation date was deductible as a debt owed under section 2(m), while the Tribunal could not entertain a revenue enhancement request beyond the subject-matter of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>