https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339917 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with consequential relief, holding that the demand was barred by limitation due to interpretational challenges and lack of clarity in the law. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties cannot be imposed or sustained for the extended period when there are interpretational issues, referencing previous judgments and Division Bench decisions to support its decision. en-us Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339917 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with consequential relief, holding that the demand was barred by limitation due to interpretational challenges and lack of clarity in the law. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties cannot be imposed or sustained for the extended period when there are interpretational issues, referencing previous judgments and Division Bench decisions to support its decision. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339917