<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 415 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339912</link>
    <description>Tents classifiable under Chapter 63 and made of cotton, with no textile material other than cotton, fell within Notification No. 29/04-CE. The presence of poles, rods, pins and similar non-textile accessories did not exclude the goods from the exemption where they were cleared as tents and the accessories formed part of the assessable value. On that basis, the tents qualified for the concessional 4% rate under the notification, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 14:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 415 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339912</link>
      <description>Tents classifiable under Chapter 63 and made of cotton, with no textile material other than cotton, fell within Notification No. 29/04-CE. The presence of poles, rods, pins and similar non-textile accessories did not exclude the goods from the exemption where they were cleared as tents and the accessories formed part of the assessable value. On that basis, the tents qualified for the concessional 4% rate under the notification, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>