<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 401 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339898</link>
    <description>When assessment, reassessment and forfeiture orders are set aside without any consequential remand direction, the matter should be restored to the assessing authority for a fresh decision in accordance with law. The absence of a remand leaves the assessee and the purchaser without a proper forum to contest the levy and causes procedural prejudice. The Karnataka HC clarified that the statutory assessment process must be carried back to the stage where it can be lawfully completed, with an opportunity of hearing to the affected party. The proceedings were therefore required to be remanded for de novo consideration, with liberty to raise all available objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 08:37:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 401 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339898</link>
      <description>When assessment, reassessment and forfeiture orders are set aside without any consequential remand direction, the matter should be restored to the assessing authority for a fresh decision in accordance with law. The absence of a remand leaves the assessee and the purchaser without a proper forum to contest the levy and causes procedural prejudice. The Karnataka HC clarified that the statutory assessment process must be carried back to the stage where it can be lawfully completed, with an opportunity of hearing to the affected party. The proceedings were therefore required to be remanded for de novo consideration, with liberty to raise all available objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>