<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 393 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339890</link>
    <description>The court held that the Assessing Officer cannot reopen the assessment based solely on the District Valuation Officer&#039;s report after the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has already considered and rejected it. The court quashed and set aside the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for reopening the assessment for the Assessment Year 2005-06. The petition was allowed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 393 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339890</link>
      <description>The court held that the Assessing Officer cannot reopen the assessment based solely on the District Valuation Officer&#039;s report after the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has already considered and rejected it. The court quashed and set aside the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for reopening the assessment for the Assessment Year 2005-06. The petition was allowed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>