<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 390 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339887</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Years 2008-09, 2009-10, and 2010-11. The Court found that the Assessee&#039;s actions did not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars but were based on professional advice, distinguishing the case from instances of non-voluntary income disclosure. The Court concluded that no substantial legal question arose from the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the deletion of penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 08:36:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 390 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339887</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Years 2008-09, 2009-10, and 2010-11. The Court found that the Assessee&#039;s actions did not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars but were based on professional advice, distinguishing the case from instances of non-voluntary income disclosure. The Court concluded that no substantial legal question arose from the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the deletion of penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>