<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1626 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190897</link>
    <description>Appellate power in a refund dispute required the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide the legal issue on its merits rather than remand it to the original authority. Where the controversy turns on interpretation of law, a send-back is inappropriate if the appellate authority can adjudicate the matter. The remand was set aside, and the Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to determine the refund claim on merits; the appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 10:40:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1626 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190897</link>
      <description>Appellate power in a refund dispute required the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide the legal issue on its merits rather than remand it to the original authority. Where the controversy turns on interpretation of law, a send-back is inappropriate if the appellate authority can adjudicate the matter. The remand was set aside, and the Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to determine the refund claim on merits; the appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>