https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339873 The Court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition seeking to quash summons for service tax demands. The petitioner, an authorized dealer, received commissions falling under "business auxiliary service" and was held liable for service tax. Despite claims of double taxation and unjust enrichment, the Court found no grounds to interfere, citing the petitioner's failure to avail statutory remedies like appeals and refund applications. The Court deemed the petition an abuse of process and upheld the dismissal, emphasizing the availability of alternative remedies previously not pursued by the petitioner. en-us Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Mar 2018 17:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339873 The Court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition seeking to quash summons for service tax demands. The petitioner, an authorized dealer, received commissions falling under "business auxiliary service" and was held liable for service tax. Despite claims of double taxation and unjust enrichment, the Court found no grounds to interfere, citing the petitioner's failure to avail statutory remedies like appeals and refund applications. The Court deemed the petition an abuse of process and upheld the dismissal, emphasizing the availability of alternative remedies previously not pursued by the petitioner. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339873