https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339871 The Tribunal allowed the appeals and set aside the impugned orders denying the refund claim under Notification No. 41/2007-ST. It ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that all services availed for export, provided by the service provider, and utilized by the appellant were eligible for a refund. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of meeting all conditions for refund claims and clarified that timely refund claims filed within the amended period were eligible for consideration. The appellant was directed to receive the refund, highlighting the adherence to legal principles and previous decisions supporting the eligibility for a refund in such cases. en-us Tue, 07 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Mar 2017 08:53:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339871 The Tribunal allowed the appeals and set aside the impugned orders denying the refund claim under Notification No. 41/2007-ST. It ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that all services availed for export, provided by the service provider, and utilized by the appellant were eligible for a refund. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of meeting all conditions for refund claims and clarified that timely refund claims filed within the amended period were eligible for consideration. The appellant was directed to receive the refund, highlighting the adherence to legal principles and previous decisions supporting the eligibility for a refund in such cases. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 07 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339871