<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 369 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339866</link>
    <description>Differential duty demanded on goods cleared to sister units was held unsustainable on the ground of revenue neutrality. Because the clearances were to the appellant&#039;s own units, any additional duty payable would have been available as credit to the recipient units, and the record also showed that those units paid duty through PLA. The resulting exercise was duty-neutral and would not have produced any net revenue gain for the department. On that basis, the valuation dispute was not examined further, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2019 15:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 369 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339866</link>
      <description>Differential duty demanded on goods cleared to sister units was held unsustainable on the ground of revenue neutrality. Because the clearances were to the appellant&#039;s own units, any additional duty payable would have been available as credit to the recipient units, and the record also showed that those units paid duty through PLA. The resulting exercise was duty-neutral and would not have produced any net revenue gain for the department. On that basis, the valuation dispute was not examined further, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>