<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 367 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339864</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the impugned order in a case concerning the demand of duty on transportation charges and the adjustment of duty due against excess paid during a specific period. The appellant succeeded on the limitation issue, with the tribunal ruling in their favor. The judgment delves into the legal and factual intricacies of the dispute, emphasizing the lack of justification for adding transportation costs to the assessable value and the absence of evidence supporting the extended notice period for adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 08:46:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 367 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339864</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the impugned order in a case concerning the demand of duty on transportation charges and the adjustment of duty due against excess paid during a specific period. The appellant succeeded on the limitation issue, with the tribunal ruling in their favor. The judgment delves into the legal and factual intricacies of the dispute, emphasizing the lack of justification for adding transportation costs to the assessable value and the absence of evidence supporting the extended notice period for adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>