<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 363 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339860</link>
    <description>Penalty under the CENVAT credit regime could not be sustained where the solvents had deteriorated, were unfit for manufacture, and were cleared as spent solvents after payment of duty and interest. The record did not establish suppression of facts or wilful misstatement, so the ingredients for penal action were absent. The penalty was therefore set aside, while the duty demand and interest remained undisturbed, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 08:46:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 363 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339860</link>
      <description>Penalty under the CENVAT credit regime could not be sustained where the solvents had deteriorated, were unfit for manufacture, and were cleared as spent solvents after payment of duty and interest. The record did not establish suppression of facts or wilful misstatement, so the ingredients for penal action were absent. The penalty was therefore set aside, while the duty demand and interest remained undisturbed, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>