https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7001 The court found the writ petitions maintainable under Article 226, allowing for the sought reliefs. It determined the petitioners should be assessed as a Hindu undivided family based on a settlement deed, concluding it constituted a partition of properties. Declarations by the father and petitioners supported this interpretation, leading to the quashing of previous individual assessments. The court directed the assessing authorities to assess the petitioners as a Hindu undivided family, recognizing the properties as joint family assets. en-us Tue, 14 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Feb 2009 18:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7001 The court found the writ petitions maintainable under Article 226, allowing for the sought reliefs. It determined the petitioners should be assessed as a Hindu undivided family based on a settlement deed, concluding it constituted a partition of properties. Declarations by the father and petitioners supported this interpretation, leading to the quashing of previous individual assessments. The court directed the assessing authorities to assess the petitioners as a Hindu undivided family, recognizing the properties as joint family assets. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 14 Mar 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7001