https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339854 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal filed by the manufacturing company and fully allowed the appeals by the individual appellants, granting them consequential relief as per law. The Tribunal found the evidence of duty evasion based on shortages of finished goods and loose slips to be unreliable and insufficient, setting aside the confirmation of demands. Additionally, the penalty imposed under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 was deemed unjustified as there was no proposal for confiscation of goods, leading to a modification of the original order and a reduction in the penalties imposed. en-us Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 May 2018 11:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339854 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal filed by the manufacturing company and fully allowed the appeals by the individual appellants, granting them consequential relief as per law. The Tribunal found the evidence of duty evasion based on shortages of finished goods and loose slips to be unreliable and insufficient, setting aside the confirmation of demands. Additionally, the penalty imposed under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 was deemed unjustified as there was no proposal for confiscation of goods, leading to a modification of the original order and a reduction in the penalties imposed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339854