<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2625 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190884</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to reassess certain comparables and the risk adjustment claim. The Tribunal stressed the importance of a thorough and justified approach in determining comparability and risk adjustments. Specific directions were given regarding the inclusion/exclusion of certain companies and the need for a more comprehensive risk analysis. The issue of interest under Section 234A and Section 234B was not extensively addressed as it was not pressed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 07:46:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2625 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190884</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to reassess certain comparables and the risk adjustment claim. The Tribunal stressed the importance of a thorough and justified approach in determining comparability and risk adjustments. Specific directions were given regarding the inclusion/exclusion of certain companies and the need for a more comprehensive risk analysis. The issue of interest under Section 234A and Section 234B was not extensively addressed as it was not pressed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>