<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1161 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190893</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals of both the assessee and the revenue in a Transfer Pricing case. The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of certain comparables in the Software Development Segment and ITES Segment based on previous orders and High Court judgments. Some comparables were reinstated. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of comparables being functionally similar and meeting applied filters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 07:46:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1161 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190893</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals of both the assessee and the revenue in a Transfer Pricing case. The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of certain comparables in the Software Development Segment and ITES Segment based on previous orders and High Court judgments. Some comparables were reinstated. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of comparables being functionally similar and meeting applied filters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>