<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1568 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190896</link>
    <description>The tribunal remanded the case to the original authority for further investigation regarding the eligibility of CENVAT credit on certain items used in the manufacturing process. The authority was instructed to conduct on-site verification of item usage, consider arguments presented, and issue a reasoned order within two months. This decision aimed to ensure a fair assessment based on actual usage and allowed the appellant to provide supporting documents for their claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 07:46:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1568 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190896</link>
      <description>The tribunal remanded the case to the original authority for further investigation regarding the eligibility of CENVAT credit on certain items used in the manufacturing process. The authority was instructed to conduct on-site verification of item usage, consider arguments presented, and issue a reasoned order within two months. This decision aimed to ensure a fair assessment based on actual usage and allowed the appellant to provide supporting documents for their claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>