https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339845 Interim stay of an appellate order setting aside confiscation of imported remote-control equipment was refused because no sufficient present justification was shown. The goods were described as remote controls for domestic devices and had been regularly imported, and the record did not show a clear import restriction applicable to them at that stage. Revenue's reliance on administrative instructions for licensing officers was not treated as a basis to withhold implementation of the appellate order. In the absence of demonstrated urgency or other pressing grounds, interim interference was unwarranted and the stay request was dismissed. en-us Thu, 21 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Mar 2017 07:41:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339845 Interim stay of an appellate order setting aside confiscation of imported remote-control equipment was refused because no sufficient present justification was shown. The goods were described as remote controls for domestic devices and had been regularly imported, and the record did not show a clear import restriction applicable to them at that stage. Revenue's reliance on administrative instructions for licensing officers was not treated as a basis to withhold implementation of the appellate order. In the absence of demonstrated urgency or other pressing grounds, interim interference was unwarranted and the stay request was dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 21 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339845