https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339841 Confidentiality objections to the sunset review failed because the non-injurious price and dumping data were protected within the anti-dumping framework, the relevant margins and methodology had been disclosed in the final findings, and no prejudice was shown. The domestic industry objection also failed: Rule 2(b) did not bar treating a sole producer as the domestic industry on these facts, and related exports to a non-subject country did not disqualify it. Injury, return on capital, and causal link findings were sustained because the record showed deterioration in performance and the appellant produced no contrary evidence. Section 9A(5) permits continuation of anti-dumping duty where cessation is likely to cause recurrence of dumping and injury, and that conclusion was upheld. en-us Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Aug 2017 15:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339841 Confidentiality objections to the sunset review failed because the non-injurious price and dumping data were protected within the anti-dumping framework, the relevant margins and methodology had been disclosed in the final findings, and no prejudice was shown. The domestic industry objection also failed: Rule 2(b) did not bar treating a sole producer as the domestic industry on these facts, and related exports to a non-subject country did not disqualify it. Injury, return on capital, and causal link findings were sustained because the record showed deterioration in performance and the appellant produced no contrary evidence. Section 9A(5) permits continuation of anti-dumping duty where cessation is likely to cause recurrence of dumping and injury, and that conclusion was upheld. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339841