<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 331 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339828</link>
    <description>Consideration from sale of shrink-wrap software to Indian customers through distributors or resellers was analysed on the basis of whether it involved transfer of copyright rights or only sale of a copyrighted article. The ITAT Mumbai followed its own earlier coordinate-bench decisions and held that, absent transfer of copyright, the payment could not be treated as royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act or Article 12(3) of the India-USA DTAA. It also applied the settled principle that where two reasonable constructions of a taxing provision are possible, the interpretation favourable to the assessee should prevail, and the software-sale receipts were therefore not taxable as royalty in India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 06:58:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 331 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339828</link>
      <description>Consideration from sale of shrink-wrap software to Indian customers through distributors or resellers was analysed on the basis of whether it involved transfer of copyright rights or only sale of a copyrighted article. The ITAT Mumbai followed its own earlier coordinate-bench decisions and held that, absent transfer of copyright, the payment could not be treated as royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act or Article 12(3) of the India-USA DTAA. It also applied the settled principle that where two reasonable constructions of a taxing provision are possible, the interpretation favourable to the assessee should prevail, and the software-sale receipts were therefore not taxable as royalty in India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>