https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339827 The ITAT partially allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, ruling in favor of the assessee on various issues. The CIT(A)'s decision not to admit additional evidence regarding investment in share capital was set aside. Disallowances of office renovation expenses were overturned as revenue in nature. Residential renovation expenses were allowed depreciation. The assessee's appeal was successful on these grounds, with the order pronounced on 28th February 2017. en-us Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Mar 2017 06:58:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339827 The ITAT partially allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, ruling in favor of the assessee on various issues. The CIT(A)'s decision not to admit additional evidence regarding investment in share capital was set aside. Disallowances of office renovation expenses were overturned as revenue in nature. Residential renovation expenses were allowed depreciation. The assessee's appeal was successful on these grounds, with the order pronounced on 28th February 2017. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339827