<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 325 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339822</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the disputed addition of Rs. 9,50,000. The Tribunal found that the Assessee adequately explained the source of the deposit, making the addition unsustainable. The decision emphasized the significance of legal compliance and factual justifications in assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 06:58:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 325 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339822</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the disputed addition of Rs. 9,50,000. The Tribunal found that the Assessee adequately explained the source of the deposit, making the addition unsustainable. The decision emphasized the significance of legal compliance and factual justifications in assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>