https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190872 The Bombay High Court admitted two substantial questions of law for further consideration: whether the Tribunal was correct in confirming an addition under Section 68 in relation to advances, particularly on the evidentiary value of confirmations and bank records; and whether the Tribunal was justified in refusing to admit additional evidence concerning the loan creditor on the ground that the documents had not been filed earlier. The order concerns only admission of these issues for adjudication on their merits. en-us Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Mar 2017 16:47:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190872 The Bombay High Court admitted two substantial questions of law for further consideration: whether the Tribunal was correct in confirming an addition under Section 68 in relation to advances, particularly on the evidentiary value of confirmations and bank records; and whether the Tribunal was justified in refusing to admit additional evidence concerning the loan creditor on the ground that the documents had not been filed earlier. The order concerns only admission of these issues for adjudication on their merits. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190872