<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 307 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339804</link>
    <description>Writ courts ordinarily will not interfere with a show cause notice where the notice records a prima facie basis for taxability and the assessee can contest it before the adjudicating authority. Here, the service tax notice referred to the petitioner&#039;s activities as falling within taxable services both before and after 01.07.2012, with the statutory basis indicated under banking and financial services, business auxiliary services, and renting of immovable property service. The earlier order did not decide taxability on the merits and left the authorities free to proceed in accordance with law. The writ petitions were dismissed, leaving the petitioners to file objections before the department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 307 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339804</link>
      <description>Writ courts ordinarily will not interfere with a show cause notice where the notice records a prima facie basis for taxability and the assessee can contest it before the adjudicating authority. Here, the service tax notice referred to the petitioner&#039;s activities as falling within taxable services both before and after 01.07.2012, with the statutory basis indicated under banking and financial services, business auxiliary services, and renting of immovable property service. The earlier order did not decide taxability on the merits and left the authorities free to proceed in accordance with law. The writ petitions were dismissed, leaving the petitioners to file objections before the department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>