<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 291 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339788</link>
    <description>The Tribunal clarified that cutting and drilling activities alone did not amount to manufacturing, but if welding was involved, it constituted manufacturing. The case was remanded for further assessment of demands, ensuring a fair hearing for the appellants and adjusting cenvat credit accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 291 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339788</link>
      <description>The Tribunal clarified that cutting and drilling activities alone did not amount to manufacturing, but if welding was involved, it constituted manufacturing. The case was remanded for further assessment of demands, ensuring a fair hearing for the appellants and adjusting cenvat credit accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>