<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 290 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339787</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of M/s HGI Automotives Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Haryana General Industries, setting aside duty, interest, and penalty imposition. The case revolved around alleged clandestine removal of goods using parallel/fake invoices. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the Revenue&#039;s evidence, particularly in the reliability of recovered invoices. It emphasized the lack of evidence supporting excess raw material procurement or clandestine removal, highlighting proper procedures followed by the appellants. Ultimately, the Tribunal dismissed duty demands and penalties, stressing the importance of reliable documentation and clear substantiation of allegations in duty-related cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2017 16:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=460521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 290 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339787</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of M/s HGI Automotives Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Haryana General Industries, setting aside duty, interest, and penalty imposition. The case revolved around alleged clandestine removal of goods using parallel/fake invoices. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the Revenue&#039;s evidence, particularly in the reliability of recovered invoices. It emphasized the lack of evidence supporting excess raw material procurement or clandestine removal, highlighting proper procedures followed by the appellants. Ultimately, the Tribunal dismissed duty demands and penalties, stressing the importance of reliable documentation and clear substantiation of allegations in duty-related cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>